JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casavant, C H
Right arrow Articles by Stites, D P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casavant, C H
Right arrow Articles by Stites, D P

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1979 November; 10(5): 712-718

Comparison of a semiautomated fluorescent immunoassay system and indirect immunofluorescence for detection of antinuclear antibodies in human serum.

C H Casavant, A C Hart and D P Stites

ABSTRACT

A semiautomated fluorescent immunoassay system (FIAX) for detecting anti-nuclear antibodies (ANAs) in human serum was compared with conventional indirect immunofluorescence using microscope slides (Meloy Laboratories) coated with mouse fibroblasts. The FIAX system uses quantitative indirect immunofluorescence to measure the specific binding of ANA to a sampler coated with human epithelial cells. A total of 101 serum samples were examined for the presence of ANAs by employing both methods. At an initial 1:10 screening dilution, 23 samples were negative for ANAs by the slide method, whereas 21 samples were negative with the FIAX system. Using 2+, 3+, and 4+ subjective brightness, 68 (100%) samples were positive by the slide method, whereas 67 (98.5%) were positive with the FIAX system. ANA-positive samples were diluted twofold from 1:10 to 1:640, and positive titers were determined by both methods. Sixty (77%) of 78 positive samples titrated by FIAX came within +/-1 dilution of the titers determined by the slide method, and 75 (96%) of the samples fell within +/-2 dilutions. Results indicate good correlation between the FIAX system and indirect immunofluorescence for the detection of ANAs in human serum. The FIAX system has the advantage of speed, reproducibility, and the elimination of subjective microscopic assessment of ANA titers.


J Clin Microbiol. 1979 November; 10(5): 712-718







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1979 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.