JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Manis, R D
Right arrow Articles by Geiseler, P J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Manis, R D, Jr
Right arrow Articles by Geiseler, P J

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1984 October; 20(4): 742-746

Evaluation of Gonozyme, an enzyme immunoassay for the rapid diagnosis of gonorrhea.

R D Manis Jr, B Harris and P J Geiseler

ABSTRACT

A new indirect enzyme immunoassay (EIA), Gonozyme (Abbott Laboratories), was assessed for rapid detection of gonococcal antigens. A correlation of optic density (OD) readings by EIA with colony counts of serial dilutions of Neisseria gonorrhoeae ATCC 19424 disclosed that EIA detected 10(3) CFU/ml at OD readings of 0.1 to 0.3, that EIA consistently detected greater than or equal to 10(4) CFU/ml at OD readings of 0.6 to 1.3, and that concentrations of greater than or equal to 10(5) CFU/ml were associated with OD readings of greater than or equal to 2.0. The clinical usefulness of Gonozyme was evaluated by comparing results of EIA with those of Gram stain (GS) and culture for N. gonorrhoeae from urethral and endocervical swabs obtained prospectively in 886 randomly selected patients attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. The patients evaluated included 83 female contacts of men with gonorrhea and 56 patients seen at the clinic for test of cure. In tests with 295 males, the sensitivities of GS and EIA were 91.3 and 97.1%, respectively, and both tests had specificities of greater than 96%. In tests with 591 females, the sensitivities of GS and EIA were 51.4 and 96.4%, respectively (P less than 0.0001, Z proportionality test), and the specificities were 98.7 and 86.5%, respectively (P less than 0.0001). In tests with 61 females and 3 males, EIA was positive, whereas GS and cultures were negative for N. gonorrhoeae. Gonozyme is a highly sensitive method for rapid detection of gonococcal antigens. EIA is comparable to GS for males and more sensitive though less specific than GS for females. Possible reasons for the lower specificity of EIA for females are discussed. Due to its high negative predictive value for female contacts, EIA offers an alternative to epidemiological treatment of contacts before culture results.


J Clin Microbiol. 1984 October; 20(4): 742-746







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1984 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.