JCM Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Masendycz, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Masendycz, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Bishop, R. F.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, Dec 1997, 3104-3108, Vol 35, No. 12
Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of enzyme immunoassay, PCR, and type-specific cDNA probe techniques for identification of group A rotavirus gene 4 types (P types) [In Process Citation]

PJ Masendycz, EA Palombo, RJ Gorrell and RF Bishop
Department of Gastroenterology and Clinical Nutrition, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

This study was designed to evaluate three techniques most commonly used to identify the VP4 (P) types of human group A fecal rotaviruses. The techniques included PCR with nested primers and hybridization with PCR- generated probes (to determine the P genotypes). The results obtained by these genetic techniques were evaluated against those obtained by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) incorporating neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (N-MAbs) reacting with three major human P serotypes (serotypes P1A, P1B, and P2A). The P types of the rotaviruses present in 102 fecal specimens were determined under code by each of the three assays. The specificity of each assay was evaluated against a "gold standard" putative P type (P serotype and genotype) deduced from knowledge of the VP7 (G) type and the origin of the fecal specimen. Overall comparison of the results showed respective sensitivities and specificities of 92 and 92% for reverse transcription-PCR, 80 and 99% for hybridization, and 73 and 91% for EIA with N-MAbs. The hybridization assay retained high sensitivity with specimens stored for > or = 10 years. Hybridization assays with nonradioactive probes are relatively inexpensive and are suited for use in developing countries. In summary, both genetic assays showed high sensitivities and specificities in assigning a P type to human fecal rotavirus strains. Further evaluation of the EIA with N-MAbs is required, together with incorporation of new N-MAbs for the detection of the additional P types detected in developing countries.


This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1997 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.