Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, January 1998, p. 168-178, Vol. 36, No. 1
Australian Reference Laboratory for Bovine
Tuberculosis, Animal Health Laboratories, Agriculture Western
Australia, South Perth, Western Australia 6151, Australia1;
Departamento de Patologa
Animal I (Sanidad Animal), Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad
Complutense de Madrid, s/n, 28100 Madrid,
Spain2; and
Department of
Bacteriology, Research Laboratory for Infectious Diseases, National
Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, 3720A
Bilthoven, The Netherlands3
Received 22 April 1997/Returned for modification 8 July
1997/Accepted 1 October 1997
DNA fingerprinting techniques were used to type 273 isolates of
Mycobacterium bovis from Australia, Canada, the Republic of Ireland, and Iran. The results of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis with DNA probes from IS6110,
the direct repeat (DR), and the polymorphic GC-rich sequence (PGRS) were compared with those of a new PCR-based method called spacer oligonucleotide typing (spoligotyping) developed for the rapid typing
of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (J. Kamerbeek et al., J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:907-914, 1997). Eighty-five percent of the isolates harbored a single copy of IS6110, and 81.5% of
these carried IS6110 on the characteristic 1.9-kb
restriction fragment. RFLP analysis with IS6110 identified
23 different types, RFLP analysis with the DR probe identified 35 types, RFLP analysis with the PGRS probe identified 77 types, and the
spoligotyping method identified 35 types. By combining all results, 99 different strains could be identified. Isolate clusters were frequently associated within herds or were found between herds when
epidemiological evidence confirmed animal movements. RFLP analysis with
IS6110 was sufficiently sensitive for the typing of
isolates with more than three copies of IS6110, but RFLP
analysis with the PGRS probe was the most sensitive typing technique
for strains with only a single copy of IS6110.
Spoligotyping may have advantages for the rapid typing of M. bovis, but it needs to be made more sensitive.
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Evaluation of Four DNA Typing Techniques in
Epidemiological Investigations of Bovine Tuberculosis
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Australian
Reference Laboratory for Bovine Tuberculosis, Agriculture Western
Australia, 3 Baron-Hay Ct., South Perth, Western Australia 6151, Australia. Phone: 618 9368 3429. Fax: 618 9474 1881. E-mail:
dcousins{at}agric.wa.gov.au.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. | Clin. Microbiol. Rev. |
|---|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|