This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Abdel-Hamid, M. Articles by Fix, A. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Abdel-Hamid, M. Articles by Fix, A. D.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Clinical Microbiology, May 2002, p. 1656-1659, Vol. 40, No. 5
0095-1137/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JCM.40.5.1656-1659.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Comparison of Second- and Third-Generation Enzyme Immunoassays for Detecting Antibodies to Hepatitis C Virus

Hepatitis C Project, Egypt, International Health Division, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201,¹ Minia University, Minia,,² National Liver Institute, Menoufiya,³ Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt⁴

Received 5 November 2001/ Accepted 10 February 2002

Supplemental assays, such as recombinant immunoblot assays (RIBA), are used to confirm detection of antibodies to hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, due to their expense, they are not widely used in developing countries. The purpose of our study was to compare the results of second- and third-generation (G2 and G3, respectively) enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and to resolve discordant results by using a supplemental assay to assess the reliability of G2 and G3 EIAs to confirm anti-HCV antibody-positive results. We performed both G2 and G3 EIAs for anti-HCV antibodies on 1,134 serum samples collected during the 2nd year of a longitudinal community-based study in Egypt; 35 samples with discordant results were tested by Abbott Laboratories Micro-Particle Immunoassay (M-EIA) and RIBA. Viremia was determined with an in-house nested reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) to detect HCV RNA. Concordance between the two assays (G2/G3) was 96.9%; 87 (7.7%) samples were positive and 1,012 (89.2%) were negative by both assays. For 17 samples, the discordant results were G2 assay negative and G3 assay positive, and for 18 samples, the discordant results were G2 assay positive and G3 assay negative. Among the 17 G2 assay-negative and G3 assay-positive samples, 15 were M-EIA positive and 7 were PCR positive. Among the 18 G2 assay-positive and G3 assay-negative samples, 2 were M-EIA positive and none were PCR positive. RIBA results from 24 discordant samples showed 87.5% agreement with the G3 EIA, 12.5% agreement with the G2 EIA, and 95.8% agreement with M-EIA. Eleven samples were indeterminate by RIBA and excluded from this analysis. Based on RIBA results, the sensitivity of the G3 EIA was 99%, compared to 89.8% for the G2 EIA, while the specificity of the G3 EIA was 99.8%, compared to 98.9% for the G2 EIA. These results show that the reliability of the G3 EIA in screening these sera is excellent, and the G3 assay can be used in the absence of supplemental tests where resources are limited. RIBA appears not to have advantages over the less expensive M-EIA screening assay. The main disadvantage of RIBA is the occurrence of indeterminate results, especially among problematic samples. Samples giving discordant results in multiple assays are often indeterminate with the RIBA.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kim, S., Kim, J.-H., Yoon, S., Park, Y.-H., Kim, H.-S. (2008). Clinical Performance Evaluation of Four Automated Chemiluminescence Immunoassays for Hepatitis C Virus Antibody Detection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 3919-3923 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Plancoulaine, S, Mohamed, M K, Arafa, N, Bakr, I, Rekacewicz, C, Tregouet, D-A, Obach, D, El Daly, M, Thiers, V, Feray, C, Abdel-Hamid, M, Abel, L, Fontanet, A (2008). Dissection of familial correlations in hepatitis C virus (HCV) seroprevalence suggests intrafamilial viral transmission and genetic predisposition to infection. Gut 57: 1268-1274 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Wu, F.-B., Ouyan, H.-Q., Tang, X.-Y., Zhou, Z.-X. (2008). Double-antigen sandwich time-resolved immunofluorometric assay for the detection of anti-hepatitis C virus total antibodies with improved specificity and sensitivity. J Med Microbiol 57: 947-953 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Marzouk, D, Sass, J, Bakr, I, El Hosseiny, M, Abdel-Hamid, M, Rekacewicz, C, Chaturvedi, N, Mohamed, M K, Fontanet, A (2007). Metabolic and cardiovascular risk profiles and hepatitis C virus infection in rural Egypt. Gut 56: 1105-1110 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gilson, R, Brook, M G (2006). Hepatitis A, B, and C. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: iv35-iv39 [Full Text]  
• Bakr, I, Rekacewicz, C, El Hosseiny, M, Ismail, S, El Daly, M, El-Kafrawy, S, Esmat, G, Hamid, M A, Mohamed, M K, Fontanet, A (2006). Higher clearance of hepatitis C virus infection in females compared with males. Gut 55: 1183-1187 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fehr, T., Ambuhl, P. M. (2004). Chronic hepatitis virus infections in patients on renal replacement therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19: 1049-1053 [Full Text]  
• Dufour, D. R., Talastas, M., Fernandez, M. D.A., Harris, B. (2003). Chemiluminescence Assay Improves Specificity of Hepatitis C Antibody Detection. Clin. Chem. 49: 940-944 [Abstract] [Full Text]