Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2004, p. 1471-1476, Vol. 42, No. 4
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1471-1476.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Performance and Cost Evaluation of One Commercial and Six In-House Conventional and Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR Assays for Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus
James B. Mahony,1,2* Astrid Petrich,1,2 Lisa Louie,3 Xinyu Song,2 Sylvia Chong,2 Marek Smieja,1,2 Max Chernesky,1,2 Mark Loeb,1 Susan Richardson,4 and the Ontario Laboratory Working Group for the
Rapid Diagnosis of Emerging
Infections
McMaster
University,1
Father Sean O'Sullivan
Research Centre, St. Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton,
and,2
Sunnybrook and
Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University
of Toronto and Heathcare Network,3
The Hospital for Sick
Children Toronto,
Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada4
Received 10 October 2003/
Returned for modification 26 November 2003/
Accepted 14 December 2003
We
evaluated seven reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays, including
six in-house assays and one commercial assay for the detection of
severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) RNA in
clinical specimens. RT-PCR assays targeted different genomic regions
and included three conventional assays (one nested and two non-nested)
run on a conventional heat block and four real-time assays performed in
a LightCycler (LC; Roche Diagnostics). All in-house assays were
optimized for assay parameters, including MgCl2, primer, and
probe concentrations. The commercial assay was the RealArt HPA CoV
RT-PCR assay (Artus), which was run in the LC. Testing serial dilutions
of cultured SARS-CoV showed that the analytical sensitivity of the
assays ranged from 108 to 106,
corresponding to 1 and 100 copies of viral RNA, respectively.
Significant differences in analytical sensitivities were observed
between assays (P < 0.01, probit regression analysis
for 50% sensitivity levels for the top two assays versus the
others). Testing 68 clinical specimens (including 17 respiratory tract
specimens, 29 urine samples, and 22 stools or rectal swabs)
demonstrated that six of the seven assays detected at least 17 of 18
positives (defined as positive in at least two assays), and two of the
assays had a sensitivity of 100%. There were no significant
differences in sensitivity between the assays (P = 0.5
[Cochrance Q test, least sensitive 15 of 18 versus 18 of
18]). The specificities of the assays ranged from 94.0 to
100% without significant differences (P = 0.25
to 0.5 [McNemar test]). The reagent and technologist cost of
performing the in-house PCR assays ranged from $5.46 to $9.81 Canadian
dollars (CDN) per test. The commercial assay cost was
considerably higher at $40.37 per test. The results demonstrated good
performance for all assays, providing laboratories that need to do SARS
RNA testing with a choice of assay
formats.
* Corresponding
author. Mailing address: Regional Virology and Chlamydiology
Laboratory, St. Joseph's Healthcare, 50 Charlton Ave. East,
Hamilton, Ontario L8N 4A6, Canada. Phone: (905) 521-6021. Fax: (905)
521-6083. E-mail:
mahonyj{at}mcmaster.ca.
Contributing
members of the Working Group are listed in
Acknowledgments.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, April 2004, p. 1471-1476, Vol. 42, No. 4
0095-1137/04/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1471-1476.2004
Copyright © 2004, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Marshall, D. J., Reisdorf, E., Harms, G., Beaty, E., Moser, M. J., Lee, W.-M., Gern, J. E., Nolte, F. S., Shult, P., Prudent, J. R.
(2007). Evaluation of a Multiplexed PCR Assay for Detection of Respiratory Viral Pathogens in a Public Health Laboratory Setting. J. Clin. Microbiol.
45: 3875-3882
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Louie, L., Simor, A. E., Chong, S., Luinstra, K., Petrich, A., Mahony, J., Smieja, M., Johnson, G., Gharabaghi, F., Tellier, R., Willey, B. M., Poutanen, S., Mazzulli, T., Broukhanski, G., Jamieson, F., Louie, M., Richardson, S., Ontario Laboratory Working Group for the Rapid Dia,
(2006). Detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus in Stool Specimens by Commercially Available Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assays. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 4193-4196
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Petrich, A., Mahony, J., Chong, S., Broukhanski, G., Gharabaghi, F., Johnson, G., Louie, L., Luinstra, K., Willey, B., Akhaven, P., Chui, L., Jamieson, F., Louie, M., Mazzulli, T., Tellier, R., Smieja, M., Cai, W., Chernesky, M., Richardson, S. E., for the Ontario Laboratory Working Group for the R,
(2006). Multicenter comparison of nucleic Acid extraction methods for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus RNA in stool specimens.. J. Clin. Microbiol.
44: 2681-2688
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Espy, M. J., Uhl, J. R., Sloan, L. M., Buckwalter, S. P., Jones, M. F., Vetter, E. A., Yao, J. D. C., Wengenack, N. L., Rosenblatt, J. E., Cockerill, F. R. III, Smith, T. F.
(2006). Real-Time PCR in Clinical Microbiology: Applications for Routine Laboratory Testing. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
19: 165-256
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mahony, J. B., Richardson, S.
(2005). Molecular Diagnosis of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome: The State of the Art. J. Mol. Diagn.
7: 551-559
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Inoue, M., Barkham, T., Keong, L. K., Gee, L. S., Wanjin, H.
(2005). Performance of Single-Step Gel-Based Reverse Transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) Assays Equivalent to That of Real-Time RT-PCR Assays for Detection of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Associated Coronavirus. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 4262-4265
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, I-J., Chen, P.-J., Yeh, S.-H., Chiang, Y.-P., Huang, L.-M., Chang, M.-F., Chen, S.-Y., Yang, P.-C., Chang, S.-C., Wang, W.-K., the SARS Research Group of the National Taiwan Uni,
(2005). Immunofluorescence Assay for Detection of the Nucleocapsid Antigen of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS)-Associated Coronavirus in Cells Derived from Throat Wash Samples of Patients with SARS. J. Clin. Microbiol.
43: 2444-2448
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.