This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hammond, G W Articles by Ronald, A R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hammond, G W Articles by Ronald, A R

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1978 January; 7(1): 39-43

Comparison of specimen collection and laboratory techniques for isolation of Haemophilus ducreyi.

ABSTRACT

Sixteen patients with clinical chancroid were studied prospectively; different culture media and sampling techniques from genital lesions were evaluated. Technique A was aspiration of a saline wash from the ulcer which was pooled and inoculated into rabbit blood, rabbit blood + vancomycin (5 microgram/ml), and semisolid chocolate agar + vancomycin (3 microgram/ml). Each primary culture medium was subcultured to chocolate agar with 1% IsoVitaleX (CA), CA with vancomycin (3 microgram/ml) plus polymyxin (7.5 microgram/ml; CA + vp). Technique B was the use of a cotton swab, plated directly on CA, CA + v, and CA + vp. Nine strains of Haemophilus ducreyi were obtained. Technique A yielded seven strains, whereas technique B yielded eight strains; with each technique, five strains were isolated only after use of selective antibiotic media. CA + v medium yielded the largest number of isolates. Direct inoculation by swab to CA + v from chancroidal ulcers is effective as an isolation technique for growth of H. ducreyi.

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lewis, D A, Ison, C A (2006). Chancroid. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: iv19-iv20 [Full Text]  
• Ronald, A, Kuypers, J, Lukehart, S A, Peeling, R W, Pope, V (2006). Excellence in sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnostics: recognition of past successes and strategies for the future. Sex. Transm. Infect. 82: v47-v52 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Roy-Leon, J. E., Lauzon, W. D., Toye, B., Singhal, N., Cameron, D. W. (2005). In vitro and in vivo activity of combination antimicrobial agents on Haemophilus ducreyi. J Antimicrob Chemother 56: 552-558 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lewis, D. A., Stevens, M. K., Latimer, J. L., Ward, C. K., Deng, K., Blick, R., Lumbley, S. R., Ison, C. A., Hansen, E. J. (2001). Characterization of Haemophilus ducreyi cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC Mutants in In Vitro and In Vivo Systems. Infect. Immun. 69: 5626-5634 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lewis, D. A (2000). Diagnostic tests for chancroid. Sex. Transm. Infect. 76: 137-141 [Full Text]  
• Ward, C. K., Lumbley, S. R., Latimer, J. L., Cope, L. D., Hansen, E. J. (1998). Haemophilus ducreyi Secretes a Filamentous Hemagglutinin-Like Protein. J. Bacteriol. 180: 6013-6022 [Abstract] [Full Text]