Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1998, p. 3545-3548, Vol. 36, No. 12
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Rapid and Sensitive Assay for Detection of
Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis
Guangming
Zhang and
Andrej
Weintraub*
Department of Immunology, Microbiology,
Pathology and Infectious Diseases, Division of Clinical and Oral
Bacteriology, Huddinge University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, S-141
86 Huddinge, Sweden
Received 30 June 1998/Returned for modification 4 August
1998/Accepted 3 September 1998
 |
ABSTRACT |
Bacteroides fragilis is an obligatory anaerobic,
gram-negative bacterium found among the normal intestinal flora of
humans. Enterotoxigenic strains of B. fragilis (ETBF) have
been associated with diarrheal diseases in humans and animals. The
enterotoxin of ETBF induces fluid changes in ligated intestinal
segments and cytotoxic response in HT29/C1 cells. By using a pair of
monoclonal antibodies (MAbs; MAb C3 and MAb 4H8) specific for the
lipopolysaccharide of B. fragilis, an assay based on
immunomagnetic separation (IMS) in combination with PCR (IMS-PCR) was
developed. After DNA extraction, a 294-bp fragment was amplified. The
specificity of the IMS-PCR assay was evaluated by adding previously
isolated and confirmed ETBF strains to normal fecal samples. All fecal
samples to which ETBF strains were added were positive, showing a 100%
specificity. The spiked fecal samples were also used for evaluation of
the sensitivity of the assay. The detection limit was found to be ~50
CFU/g of feces. By this method 10 clinical fecal samples (5 from
patients with diarrhea and 5 from healthy controls) were examined. The
results of PCR were in accordance with the results of the HT29/C1 cell
assay for all samples. The minimum time to retrieval of the final
result by the IMS-PCR method is 36 h. The proposed IMS-PCR assay
is rapid and sensitive for the direct detection of ETBF in stool samples.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Bacteroides fragilis, an
obligatory anaerobic bacterium found in high numbers among the normal
intestinal flora of humans, is recognized as an important cause of
intra-abdominal infections in humans (3). However, neither
diarrheal disease nor extracellular toxin production due to B. fragilis was appreciated until 1984, when Myers and coworkers
(4, 5) found that some strains of B. fragilis
were associated with diarrheal diseases in young farm animals and
humans by producing a factor with enterotoxigenic activity. Recent
studies have shown that the rate of enterotoxigenic B. fragilis (ETBF) carriage is high both in adults and in children, regardless of whether diarrhea is present (7). The role of ETBF as a diarrheal agent has been described previously (2, 8, 9,
13, 14). It has also been suggested that ETBF may be endemic in
communities (10). Therefore, more investigations on the
identification, epidemiology, and pathogenic role of ETBF are necessary.
PCR has been used to identify ETBF in pure cultures and directly from
feces (6, 11). The assays are based on amplification of the
enterotoxin gene, which encodes a zinc-binding metalloprotease (2). Pantosti et al. (6) used primers deduced
from the sequence of the gene in an assay in which stool samples were
inoculated on selective media followed by a sweep of total growth. The
sensitivity was 104 to 105 CFU/g of feces
(6). Recently, Shetab et al. (11) published a
description of a nested PCR assay for the detection of the B. fragilis enterotoxin gene with a detection limit of 100 to 1,000 CFU/g of stool. However, false-negative results may occur if PCR inhibitors, which are commonly present in stool samples, are not removed prior to amplification (16). The aim of the present study was to use well-characterized specific monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) coated on magnetic beads and subsequent specific capture of
bacteria by immunomagnetic separation (IMS) in order to concentrate and
separate the bacteria. Here, we describe an IMS-PCR assay, based on the
use of B. fragilis-specific MAbs, followed by PCR amplification of the enterotoxin gene for the rapid, sensitive, and
specific detection of ETBF directly from clinical samples.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Bacterial strains.
Clinical isolates of 21 ETBF strains were
provided by J. M. Albert from the International Centre for
Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh, in Dhaka, Bangladesh. All the
ETBF strains produced enterotoxin, as shown in an assay with the
HT29/C1 cell line (see below). The nonenterotoxigenic
Bacteroides strains investigated were B. fragilis
NCTC 9343 and B. thetaiotaomicron NCTC 10582 (National
Collection of Type Cultures, London, United Kingdom); B. fragilis VPI 5631, B. fragilis VPI 4225, B. fragilis VPI 4117, and B. fragilis VPI 2552 (Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg); and
B. fragilis ATCC 23745, B. ovatus ATCC 8483, and
B. vulgatus ATCC 8482 (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, Md.). In addition, Salmonella typhi IS 501, Shigella flexneri 4bR, Escherichia coli
(serotypes O:35, O:104, O:136, and O:138), and Vibrio
cholerae O139 strains were from the strain collection at the
Division of Clinical and Oral Bacteriology, Huddinge University Hospital.
All anaerobic strains were grown on blood agar for 18 to 40 h at
37°C under anaerobic conditions (GasPak; BBL Microbiology Systems,
Cockeysville, Md.). Aerobic bacterial strains were cultured at 37°C
on blood agar plates.
Production and purification of MAbs.
The MAbs used in this
study were basically prepared as described earlier (1). Two
different MAbs were used: MAb 4H8 (immunoglobulin G3 [IgG3]), which
binds to an immunodominant epitope in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of a
majority of B. fragilis isolates (17), and MAb C3 (IgG2b), which most likely binds to a common epitope present in the
inner core region of B. fragilis LPS (18). Both
MAbs were purified from serum-free medium with a protein A column
(Sigma Chemical Company, St. Louis, Mo.).
Coagglutination test.
Staphylococcus aureus Cowan I
bacteria (Sigma) were sensitized individually with 0.1 ml of MAb C3 (1 mg/ml) and 0.1 ml of MAb 4H8 (1 mg/ml).
Two to five colonies of the bacterial strains to be investigated were
suspended in 0.05 ml of 2% coagglutination test reagent on a glass
slide, which was rocked back and forth for 2 min (12, 17).
Agglutination was registered during the period and was recorded as 2+
when the agglutination was clear by examination with the naked eye and
as 1+ if a magnifying glass was needed for observation. Readings of
both 1+ and 2+ are regarded as positive results.
Preparation of spiked fecal samples and clinical fecal samples
for IMS.
ETBF-negative stool samples were collected. In order to
estimate the sensitivity of the IMS-PCR assay under experimental
conditions, serial 10-fold dilutions of the ETBF D-94 strain were
prepared in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the mixture was added to a preweighed stool sample in order to obtain concentrations ranging
from 106 to 10 CFU/ml. Briefly, 0.1 ml of diluted strain
D-94 was added to 0.9 ml of diluted feces (1 g/5 ml in PBS). Similar
procedures were also followed with ETBF-negative stool samples spiked
with other strains tested in the study (see Table 2). The spiked fecal samples (ca. 1 ml) were inoculated into prereduced peptone yeast glucose (PYG) broth medium (4.5 ml) containing 0.05% (wt/vol) kanamycin (Sigma), and the mixture was incubated at 37°C for 24 to
48 h. After incubation, the broth medium was centrifuged at 600 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and
centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 10 min, and the pellet
was suspended in 80 µl of PBS for incubation with magnetic beads.
Clinical fecal samples from patients with diarrhea and from healthy
controls were collected and inoculated into tubes containing PYG and
kanamycin by the same procedure described above.
IMS.
Rat anti-mouse IgG2b-coated Dynabeads M450 and sheep
anti-mouse IgG-coated Dynabeads M280 (Dynal, Oslo, Norway) were used. The amounts of the MAbs required for coating of the immunomagnetic particles were determined according to the manufacturer's
recommendations, with minor modifications. Briefly, 1 µl of MAb C3 (1 mg/ml) was mixed with 25 µl of rat anti-mouse IgG2b-coated Dynabeads
M450 (4 × 108 beads/ml), and 1.5 µl of MAb 4H8
(1 mg/ml) was mixed with 25 µl of sheep anti-mouse IgG-coated
Dynabeads M280 (6 × 108 to 7 × 108
beads/ml). The volumes were adjusted to 100 µl with PBS, and the
beads were incubated overnight with bidirectional rotation at 4°C.
The coated beads were washed three times with PBS containing 0.05%
Tween 20 (Merck, Schuchardt, Munich, Germany) and were resuspended in
PBS with 0.5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma) at 107
beads/ml. The beads were stored at 4°C until they were used.
The coated beads (12.5 µl each) were transferred to a 96-well
microtiter plate (Techne, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Spiked fecal
samples (80 µl) were added to the wells, and the plate was incubated
with shaking for 1 h at room temperature. With the aid of the
magnetic separator (Beadprep 96; Techne), the beads with bound bacteria
were washed three times with 150 µl of PBS-0.05% Tween 20, for 2 min each time, with gentle shaking. The beads were suspended in 70 µl
of Milli Q water. Fifty microliters was transferred to an Eppendorf
tube (1.5 ml) and boiled for 10 min, and the tube was centrifuged at
20,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C (Microcentrifuge 154;
Ole Dich, Huidovre, Denmark). The supernatants were collected and kept
at 4°C for subsequent PCR analyses.
PCR assay.
The primers used in the study were those
described by Pantosti et al. (6). The forward primer
(BF1; 5'-dGACGGTGTATGTGATTTGTCTGAGAGA-3') and the reverse
primer (BF2; 5'-dATCCCTAAGATTTTATTATTATCCCAAGTA-3') were
synthesized by Interactiva Biotechnologie GmbH (Ulm, Germany). The
specific amplified 294-bp band of DNA is expected.
Twenty microliters of the supernatant containing bacterial DNA was
added to a mixture containing 1× PCR buffer with each deoxynucleoside triphosphate (Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, Conn.) at a concentration of 200 µM, 1.25 U of Ampli-Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin-Elmer) per 50 µl,
and 20 pmol of each primer in a final volume of 50 µl of enzyme
buffer containing 2.5 mM MgCl2 (Perkin-Elmer). The
amplification was subjected to 35 cycles with a GeneAmp PCR System 9600 (Perkin-Elmer), which consisted of 5 min of denaturation at 94°C, 1 min of annealing at 58°C, 1 min of extension at 72°C, and a final
5-min extension at 72°C.
For PCR, ETBF D-134 was used as a positive control. Negative controls
were (i) water instead of template DNA (reagent control) and (ii)
B. fragilis NCTC 9343 (a non-ETBF strain) template DNA (specificity control).
PCR products (10 µl) were evaluated by electrophoresis with a 1.5%
(wt/vol) agarose gel (Gibco Life Technologies, Paisley, United Kingdom)
containing ethidium bromide at 90 mV for 60 min. A molecular mass
marker (Marker V; Boehringer Mannheim GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) was run
concurrently. The DNA bands were visualized and photographed under UV light.
Enterotoxin assay with HT29/C1 cells.
To assess whether
enterotoxin was produced, after the separation from each fecal sample
20 µl of the magnetic beads was inoculated into brain heart infusion
broth (BHI) supplemented with hemin (5 µg/ml), and the mixture was
incubated at 37°C for 48 h in an anaerobic cabinet. The broth
cultures were centrifuged at 3,000 × g for 10 min, and
the supernatants were filtered through a 0.20-µm-pore-size filter
(Sartorius AG, Göttingen, Germany). The filtered supernatants were frozen immediately and were kept at
20°C until use.
The cytotoxicity assay with HT29/C1 cells was performed as described
earlier by Weikel et al. (15). Briefly, HT29/C1 cells were
grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Gibco), trypsinized with
0.005% trypsin-0.05 mM EDTA (Sigma), and resuspended at 200 µl/well
in a 96-well microtiter plate (Costar, Cambridge, Mass.). The cells
were allowed to grow for 3 days until discrete clusters of cells were
visible. The medium was replaced with 200 µl of fresh medium without
fetal calf serum. The filtered bacterial culture supernatant (100 µl)
was added to the wells in duplicate. The plate was incubated at 37°C
in the air with 10% CO2 and was examined after 3 h
for the presence of the typical toxin-induced cytopathic changes.
Strain ETBF D-134 was used as a positive control. Negative controls
included medium alone and filtered supernatant from the
nonenterotoxigenic strain B. fragilis NCTC 9343.
 |
RESULTS |
Coagglutination tests of ETBF strains with two MAbs.
Both
coagglutination test reagents were used for all 21 ETBF strains (Table
1). All strains except ETBF D-93 and ETBF
D-115 were positive by tests with MAb C3. However, these two strains were positive when MAb 4H8 was used. By tests with both MAbs, all 21 strains were correctly identified as B. fragilis. Fourteen strains reacted with both coagglutination test reagents (Table 1).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
TABLE 1.
Results of coagglutination tests with ETBF strains and
specific anti-B. fragilis MAbs absorbed to protein
A-containing staphylococci
|
|
Sensitivity of IMS-PCR for detection of ETBF.
The sensitivity
of the IMS-PCR assay was investigated with fecal samples spiked with
10-fold dilutions of ETBF D-94. The DNA from bacterial cells isolated
by IMS was subjected to PCR. As determined by electrophoresis, the
lowest original dilution of ETBF bacteria that could be detected by
IMS-PCR was 102 CFU/ml (Fig.
1). This corresponds to ~50 CFU per g
of fecal sample. No amplification of DNA from nonspiked fecal samples
could be seen.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
IMS-PCR products from spiked fecal samples prepared with
serial dilutions of ETBF D-94. Lanes 1 to 6, dilutions from
106 to 10 CFU/ml, respectively; lane 7, positive control;
lane 8, negative control; lanes M, DNA molecular mass markers (Marker
V; Boehringer Mannheim). The 294-bp product correlates with the
amplified portion of the enterotoxin gene.
|
|
Detection of ETBF in spiked fecal samples by IMS-PCR.
Fecal
samples spiked with different strains were tested. PCR followed by
electrophoresis showed that only in tests with the ETBF strains listed
in Table 2 was the amplification product detected (294 bp) (Fig. 2). None of the
fecal samples spiked with other bacterial strains was positive.
Nonspiked fecal samples were also negative.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
IMS-PCR products from spiked fecal samples and clinical
samples. Lanes: 1, ETBF D-100 (104 CFU/ml); 2, ETBF D-104
(104 CFU/ml); 3, nonenterotoxigenic B. fragilis
NCTC 9343; 4, E. coli O:104, 5, B. vulgatus; 6, fecal sample a; 7, fecal sample b; 8, control sample; 9, positive
control; 10, negative control; M, DNA molecular mass markers. The
294-bp product correlates with the amplified portion of the enterotoxin
gene.
|
|
Detection of ETBF in fecal samples by IMS-PCR and HT29/C1
cell assay.
Five fecal samples from patients with diarrhea and
five fecal samples from healthy controls were tested by the IMS-PCR
assay. Amplification products were found in tests with three of five samples from patients with diarrhea (Fig. 2). The samples from healthy
controls were negative.
The clinical samples were also tested by the HT29/C1 cell assay after
growth in brain heart infusion medium. All three samples from the
patients positive for the amplification product by IMS-PCR caused
alterations in the morphologies of HT29/C1 cells. Both the
IMS-PCR-negative samples from the patients with diarrhea and those from
the healthy controls were negative by the HT29/C1 cell assay.
 |
DISCUSSION |
ETBF has been considered to be an important cause of diarrheal
disease in humans as a result of the production of an enterotoxin (5, 8). The epidemiology of ETBF or its pathogenic role is
not fully understood. No final proof has yet been provided to define
the pathogenic importance of this microorganism in diarrheal diseases.
To evaluate the association between diarrhea and the presence of ETBF,
it is necessary to detect the microorganism from among the complex
mixture of bacterial flora in the feces and to investigate its ability
to produce enterotoxin. A direct PCR assay has been used to detect ETBF
from fecal samples (6, 11). However, the PCR inhibitors
present in feces seem to affect the sensitivity of this method and can
cause false-negative results (16). Therefore, we developed a
combined IMS and PCR assay for the specific, sensitive, and rapid
detection of ETBF in feces.
The MAbs used in this study (MAb 4H8 and MAb C3) were described
earlier: MAb 4H8, which specifically binds to an immunodominant epitope
of LPSs from B. fragilis (17), and MAb C3, which
most likely recognizes an epitope in the inner core region of LPSs from
B. fragilis (18). Mixtures of magnetic beads
individually coated with one of the two MAbs were used in order to
increase the capacity to capture B. fragilis in the IMS
procedure. Before applying the fecal samples to IMS, the samples were
inoculated into PYG broth containing kanamycin. An antibiotic agent was
used to inhibit aerobic bacteria and to select for B. fragilis. With the aid of magnetic beads, the captured B. fragilis strains are concentrated, and the substances which may be
inhibitory to PCR analyses are effectively removed. Combined with PCR,
the assay provided a very sensitive method for the detection of ETBF in fecal samples, with a detection limit of ~50 CFU/g of feces.
Although the time required for analysis is extended, we believe
that incubation of the captured B. fragilis in PYG medium is
necessary. The minimum time from receipt of the sample to the final PCR
result was 36 h if the incubation in PYG medium was carried out
for 24 h. This can be compared to the time required to perform the
conventional method, i.e., the cell culture cytotoxicity assay,
which takes between 48 and 60 h.
The fecal samples spiked with ETBF were positive by IMS-PCR, and the
amplified 294-bp product was detected. None of the samples spiked with
other (nonenterotoxigenic) B. fragilis isolates was positive. In addition, three of five clinical fecal samples from patients with diarrhea yielded the amplification products, and these
samples were also tested by the HT29/C1 cell assay, which confirmed the
enterotoxin production, thus showing that the IMS-PCR assay is specific
for the detection of ETBF in clinical samples.
In order to fully evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the
method described here, a study with larger numbers of samples must be
conducted. We are currently evaluating this method by analyzing a large
collection of fecal samples from patients with diarrhea and control subjects.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This study was supported by the Ruth and Rickard Julins Foundation.
We are grateful to Kerstin Bergman for skillful technical assistance in
this study.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division of
Clinical and Oral Bacteriology, F82, Huddinge University Hospital,
S-141 86 Huddinge, Sweden. Phone: 46-8 5858 7831. Fax: 46-8 711 3918. E-mail: andrej.weintraub{at}impi.ki.se.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
de St. Groth, S. F., and D. Scheidegger.
1980.
Production of monoclonal antibodies: strategy and tactics.
J. Immunol. Methods
39:369-375[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Moncrief, J. S.,
R. Obiso,
L. A. Barroso,
J. J. Kling,
R. H. Wright,
R. L. Van Tassell,
D. M. Lyerly, and T. D. Wilkins.
1995.
The enterotoxin of Bacteroides fragilis is a metalloprotease.
Infect. Immun.
63:175-181[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Moore, W., and L. Holdeman.
1974.
Human fecal flora: the normal flora of 20 Japanese-Hawaiians.
Appl. Microbiol.
27:961-979[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Myers, L. L.,
B. D. Firehammer,
D. S. Shoop, and M. M. Border.
1984.
Bacteroides fragilis: a possible cause of acute diarrheal disease in newborn lambs.
Infect. Immun.
44:241-244[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Myers, L. L.,
D. S. Shoop,
B. D. Firehammer, and M. M. Border.
1985.
Association of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis with diarrheal disease in calves.
J. Infect. Dis.
152:1344-1347[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Pantosti, A.,
M. Malpeli,
M. Wilks,
M. Grazia Menozzi, and F. D'Ambrosio.
1997.
Detection of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis by PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
35:2482-2486[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Pantosti, A.,
M. G. Menozzi,
A. Frate,
L. Sanfilippo,
F. D'Ambrosio, and M. Malpeli.
1997.
Detection of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis and its toxin in stool samples from adults and children in Italy.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
24:12-16[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Sack, R. B.,
L. L. Myers,
J. Almeido-Hill,
D. S. Shoop,
W. C. Bradbury,
R. Reid, and M. Santosham.
1992.
Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis: epidemiologic studies of its role as a human diarrhoeal pathogen.
J. Diarrhoeal Dis. Res.
10:4-9[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Sears, C.,
S. Koshy,
R. Van Tassell, and F. Chambers.
1994.
Pathophysiology of human intestinal epithelial monolayers (T84) treated with the toxin of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis.
In
Program and abstracts of the Congress on Anaerobic Bacteria and Anaerobic Infections. Anaerobic Society of the Americas, Los Angeles, Calif.
|
| 10.
|
Sears, C. L.,
L. L. Myers,
A. Lazenby, and R. L. Van Tassell.
1995.
Enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis.
Clin. Infect. Dis.
20:S142-S148.
|
| 11.
|
Shetab, R.,
S. H. Cohen,
T. Prindiville,
Y. J. Tang,
M. Cantrell,
D. Rahmani, and J. J. Silva.
1998.
Detection of Bacteroides fragilis enterotoxin gene by PCR.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
36:1729-1732[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Svenungsson, B., and A. A. Lindberg.
1978.
Identification of Salmonella bacteria by co-agglutination, using antibodies against synthetic disaccharide-protein antigens O2, O4, and O9, adsorbed to protein A-containing staphylococci.
Acta Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. Sect. B
86:283-290.
|
| 13.
|
Van Tassell, R.,
D. Lyerly, and T. Wilkins.
1994.
Characterization of enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis by a toxin-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.
1:1-7[Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Van Tassell, R.,
D. Lyerly, and T. Wilkins.
1992.
Purification and characterization of an enterotoxigenic Bacteroides fragilis.
Infect. Immun.
60:1343-1350[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Weikel, C. S.,
F. D. Grieco,
J. Reuben,
L. L. Myers, and R. B. Sack.
1992.
Human colonic epithelial cells, HT29/C1, treated with crude Bacteroides fragilis enterotoxin dramatically alter their morphology.
Infect. Immun.
60:321-327[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Wilde, J.,
J. Eiden, and R. Yolken.
1990.
Removal of inhibitory substances from human fecal specimens for detection of group A rotaviruses by reverse transcriptase and polymerase chain reactions.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
28:1300-1307[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
| Zhang, G., Q. Pan, and A. Weintraub. Identification
of Bacteroides fragilis by modified immuno polymerase chain
reaction (mIPCR), using a specific monoclonal antibody. Anaerobe, in
press.
|
| 18.
|
Zhang, G., and A. Weintraub.
1997.
Identification of Bacteroides fragilis by coagglutination, using a specific monoclonal antibody.
Anaerobe
3:295-300.
|
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, December 1998, p. 3545-3548, Vol. 36, No. 12
0095-1137/98/$04.00+0
Copyright © 1998, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Corona-Barrera, E., Smith, D. G.E., La, T., Hampson, D. J., Thomson, J. R.
(2004). Immunomagnetic separation of the intestinal spirochaetes Brachyspira pilosicoli and Brachyspira hyodysenteriae from porcine faeces. J Med Microbiol
53: 301-307
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Holland, J. L., Louie, L., Simor, A. E., Louie, M.
(2000). PCR Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 Directly from Stools: Evaluation of Commercial Extraction Methods for Purifying Fecal DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol.
38: 4108-4113
[Abstract]
[Full Text]