This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kilvington, S Articles by White, D G Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kilvington, S Articles by White, D G

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 February; 29(2): 310-314

Differentiation of Acanthamoeba strains from infected corneas and the environment by using restriction endonuclease digestion of whole-cell DNA.

S Kilvington, J R Beeching and D G White

Public Health Laboratory, University of Bath, Claverton Down, England.

ABSTRACT

Restriction endonuclease digestion of Acanthamoeba whole-cell DNA was used to study the relationship between 33 morphologically identical strains from keratitis cases (30 strains), contact lens storage containers (2 strains), and soil (1 strain). Samples digested with BglII, EcoRI, or HindIII and separated by agarose gel electrophoresis contained detectable mitochondrial DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs). By comparing RFLPs, the strains could be assigned to seven multiple-strain and three single-strain groups. The largest of these contained nine strains, eight of which were isolated in keratitis cases in various locations worldwide and may indicate a group particularly associated with keratitis. Restriction endonuclease analysis of whole-cell DNA is proposed as a valuable technique for detecting mitochondrial DNA RFLPs in the differentiation of morphologically identical Acanthamoeba strains and may therefore be useful in resolving the complex taxonomy of the genus, which has hitherto been founded on subjective morphological criteria.

---

J Clin Microbiol. 1991 February; 29(2): 310-314

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Kilvington, S., Gray, T., Dart, J., Morlet, N., Beeching, J. R., Frazer, D. G., Matheson, M. (2004). Acanthamoeba Keratitis: The Role of Domestic Tap Water Contamination in the United Kingdom. IOVS 45: 165-169 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Marciano-Cabral, F., Cabral, G. (2003). Acanthamoeba spp. as Agents of Disease in Humans. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 273-307 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kong, H.-H., Shin, J.-Y., Yu, H.-S., Kim, J., Hahn, T.-W., Hahn, Y.-H., Chung, D.-I. (2002). Mitochondrial DNA Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) and 18S Small-Subunit Ribosomal DNA PCR-RFLP Analyses of Acanthamoeba Isolated from Contact Lens Storage Cases of Residents in Southwestern Korea. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 1199-1206 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Schroeder, J. M., Booton, G. C., Hay, J., Niszl, I. A., Seal, D. V., Markus, M. B., Fuerst, P. A., Byers, T. J. (2001). Use of Subgenic 18S Ribosomal DNA PCR and Sequencing for Genus and Genotype Identification of Acanthamoebae from Humans with Keratitis and from Sewage Sludge. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39: 1903-1911 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Walochnik, J., Obwaller, A., Aspöck, H. (2000). Correlations between Morphological, Molecular Biological, and Physiological Characteristics in Clinical and Nonclinical Isolates of Acanthamoeba spp.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66: 4408-4413 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mathers, W. D., Nelson, S. E., Lane, J. L., Wilson, M. E., Allen, R. C., Folberg, R. (2000). Confirmation of Confocal Microscopy Diagnosis of Acanthamoeba Keratitis Using Polymerase Chain Reaction Analysis. Arch Ophthalmol 118: 178-183 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Niszl, I. A, Markus, M. B (1998). Anti-Acanthamoeba activity of contact lens solutions. Br J Ophthalmol 82: 1033-1038 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Ledee, D. R., Seal, D. V., Byers, T. J. (1998). Confirmatory Evidence from 18S rRNA Gene Analysis for In Vivo Development of Propamidine Resistance in a Temporal Series of Acanthamoeba Ocular Isolates from a Patient. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42: 2144-2145 [Abstract] [Full Text]